Worshiping Trinity: Coming back to the heart of worship
Robin Parry (Milton Keynes: Paternoster, 2005)
The title came to my attention when I was casting about
for a term paper topic in the fall semester seminar on the Trinity. It’s not exactly a theological work, per se,
though Robin Parry is a theologian and in Worshiping
Trinity he is urging the recovery and practice of Trinitarian commitments
and vocabulary in Christian worship. Okay, so it is a theological work in the sense that worship is a theological
exercise, in the sense that it is problematic when public worship is not
considered as an expression of theology, and in the sense that too often worship
leaders (musicians and preachers) do not think that all the service components must
meet the same theological scrutiny as the sermon. Parry is balanced, clear, and
orthodox. He appropriately draws on sources as diverse as the Church Fathers
and modern worship songwriters, on Methodist hymn writer Charles Wesley and the
Catholic theologian Karl Rahner.
I found Parry’s tone distracting. I’m not sure how much of
that is because he is English (with that distinct, droll, ironical humor) and
how much that he is Charismatic (with a stereotypical ambivalence about
theology). He is a PhD in theology, gaining his degree under Gordon Wenham (University of Gloucestershire) –
so, no theological lightweight. But as he writes about worship and the Trinity,
he is sometimes wacky; not about worship or the Trinity, but still in a
distracting way, for my taste. I love me some English humor and
self-effacement, but I think the informal way of doing theology in this book
would be just as effective without chapter titles such as the first: “Theology
and Worship up a Tree, K.I.S.S.I.N.G.” Or with asides like this one: “the
examples we have examined so far are what we could call ‘fruitcake’ songs. I don’t mean that they were written by people
who are or were fruitcakes! I mean that . . . “ (129, emphasis added). Or
this particularly distracting: “There have been occasions when we shy away from
using the ‘F-word’ (Father) in worship.” (105) Really?! I know it’s a quibble,
and the book is so fine in so many ways. Maybe I’m sensitive to it because I
have been in a context where some feel that the way to de-formalize a
traditional service is to tell jokes. This book would have been as acceptably
informal without such distractions.
Grumbling aside, Parry has
- offered a thorough introduction to the theology of the Trinity,
- situated it in the church’s public worship,
- identified its absence across Protestant practices of worship (formal Anglican as well as his own charismatic service),
- bridged history and ecclesiologies to provide good examples and remedies,
- analyzed song and hymn lyrics,
- provided a system for categorizing songs according to their Trinitarian content,
- and provided helpful suggestions for modern song and hymn writers.
He does not limit himself to congregational song, however;
his healthy theology of worship includes every action of gathered worship, so
he addresses the sacraments, praying, and preaching. An author that will quote both
Basil of Caesarea and Matt Redman while making the same point has done his work
and knows how to work his material. In spite of my rant about tone, this is a
book I will recommend and use.
2 comments:
Did you mean to title this post as you did? That's how my father sounded when he was talking about doing laundry. He also stuck a "b" sound in the number 11.
Thank you, "sharp-eyed reader"! Ha! yes, that was a typo. I may have made eleben such typos without having them poinned out tah me, 'fwernt for yew.
Post a Comment